<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Two more</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.reenigne.org/blog/two-more/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.reenigne.org/blog/two-more/</link>
	<description>Stuff I think about</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 21:39:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.reenigne.org/blog/two-more/comment-page-1/#comment-1979</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 03:37:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reenigne.org/blog/?p=697#comment-1979</guid>
		<description>Actually, it is artists, not mathematicians, who have claimed that the golden rectangle is the one with the most pleasing aspect ratio. It has been incorporated into a great deal of art from ancient Greek architecture to the drawings and paintings of Leonardo da Vinci. While there are some neat mathematical qualities to this number, I don&#039;t think there are any mathematical reasons for it to be considered the most aesthetic - it seems to be more a piece of artistic lore.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, it is artists, not mathematicians, who have claimed that the golden rectangle is the one with the most pleasing aspect ratio. It has been incorporated into a great deal of art from ancient Greek architecture to the drawings and paintings of Leonardo da Vinci. While there are some neat mathematical qualities to this number, I don't think there are any mathematical reasons for it to be considered the most aesthetic - it seems to be more a piece of artistic lore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kaz Maslanka</title>
		<link>http://www.reenigne.org/blog/two-more/comment-page-1/#comment-1935</link>
		<dc:creator>Kaz Maslanka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 06:38:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reenigne.org/blog/?p=697#comment-1935</guid>
		<description>It certain that the golden rectangle is sublime in its beauty by way of the aesthetics of mathematics however, it is no more beautiful than a box of corn flakes by the aesthetic criteria of art. 

Bottom line is that your image is wonderful! it is just have very little to do with art.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It certain that the golden rectangle is sublime in its beauty by way of the aesthetics of mathematics however, it is no more beautiful than a box of corn flakes by the aesthetic criteria of art. </p>
<p>Bottom line is that your image is wonderful! it is just have very little to do with art.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

