Sometimes I’ll be really proud of a blog post after having written it, but then when it comes time to actually post it I’ll cringe a bit to remember it (especially if there’s anything at all controversial in it). The feeling usually goes away (at least mostly) when I re-read the post and it isn’t as confrontational or embarrasing as I remembered it but sometimes I just have to grit my teeth and post anyway. There have been times when I have just pulled posts altogether though - either because I no longer agree with what I wrote or because I want to find a better form to put those thoughts in. Perhaps someday I’ll come back to those posts and see if they can be resurrected in some form or other.
Archive for the ‘blogging’ Category
Bloggers’ remorse
Wednesday, July 30th, 2008Boxes
Tuesday, July 22nd, 2008I recently reorganized a big box of junk and put into smaller various boxes. Behold my amazing junk classification scheme:
- Broken electronics, for spare parts or recycling
- Things that work but which I don’t currently have a use for
- Spare Ikea parts
- Ikea tools
- Stuff that I don’t know what it is.
- String
- Nails
- Screws
- Nuts and washers
- Screw eyes and pins
- Stickers
- Picture hooks
- Screw hooks
- Rawl plugs (or wall anchors as they are called here)
- Anti-static bags
- Small plastic toys (I’m sure Alexander will have a lot of fun with this box when he’s old enough not to swallow the parts)
- Junk (stuff that doesn’t fit into any of the other categories)
It occurs to me that the category system on my blog works a similar way (though the category corresponding to “junk” is called “random”).
Temporal or non-temporal blogging?
Sunday, July 20th, 2008I have a 70 day blog backlog (at time of writing, 44 at time of posting), meaning that even if I don’t write anything for 6 weeks you’ll still get a post every day before I run out. So far I have been operating this backlog as a FIFO queue which seems to work pretty well. The only problem is, though, that now if I write something it might be quite out-of-date by the time it’s posted. This discourages me from writing about current events. Perhaps I should let the backlog drain (by posting faster than I write if necessary) and then post as articles come into my head like most people do.
CSS woes
Thursday, July 17th, 2008I think I finally figured out how to properly center images that are wider than the column (450 pixels). I couldn’t seem to get all four cases (image<=450 pixels, image>450 pixels)x(IE, FireFox) working correctly. I finally resorted to using a different image class for wide images, which looks like this:
img.centerwide {
display: inline;
margin-left: -287px;
margin-right: -287px;
position: relative;
align: center;
text-align: center;
}
Of course, I’m sure this breaks every web design rule in the book and probably doesn’t work for some of the less popular browsers. Oh well, it’ll do for now until somebody complains. I really ought to learn about HTML and CSS properly.
Grand unified blog
Friday, May 9th, 2008I’ve incorporated all my old website pages (many of which were woefully out of date) into this blog, thus giving me an excuse to leave them out of date (nobody expects old blog posts to be kept up-to-date). There were 80 of them which is more than I would have guessed.
I have no idea when some of the pages were created, so I figured it out the best I could. Please ignore any temporal anomalies you might run into here. Some of the page dates I was able to figure out by looking at the timestamps of images that I created for the page but for a lot of them the only clue was the page’s timestamp. So a lot of the pages ended up on the 12th of July 2000, which is probably when I last changed the website’s background.
One nice thing about using Wordpress for everything is that now (or at least once I update the old pages to redirect to the corresponding blog pages) the entire site validates as XHTML 1.0 Transitional! Woo-hoo standards compliance!
I might still go back and edit old posts from time to time. Hey, it’s my website - I can do what I like with it. I’ll try to remember to delete any comments that such edits render incorrect. So if you notice a broken link, spelling mistake, factual error or some other update which you think I should make to an old post, feel free to comment on the post in question.
Back to the past
Sunday, April 1st, 2007Let’s see if I can get back into this blogging thing again - I know you’ve all been missing me. I have been writing all day and have almost 3 weeks worth of posts in the queue - some geeky, some funny and some though-provoking (I hope).
To start with, here’s a strange idea I had a while ago. Normally when we think of the past, we think of it as pretty well fixed. We can argue about whether some particular event happened or not but we generally agree that it either happened or it didn’t - that there is a right and a wrong answer to any question we can ask about past events. The future, on the other hand, is a lot more debatable. It may be fixed (our free will may be an illusion) or maybe there are many possible futures.
This seems to be a curious asymmetry between past and future. As far as the fundamental laws of physics are concerned, the past and the future are on an equal footing mathmatically. This suggests that either we have no free will or that our ideas about the past are incorrect. Maybe there is more than one past. Maybe the past isn’t fixed at all but in fact is actually a superposition of all possible pasts that are compatible with the present.
Furthermore, perhaps the reason that the beginning of the universe is so mysterious is just that if you go back far enough, any possible sequence of events could have resulted in the current universe, so the distant past is a superposition of everything (which carries no information).
This isn’t a scientific theory because it doesn’t make any predictions, but it might be an interesting philosophical idea to explore.
Hard news
Wednesday, August 30th, 2006Conversation from this morning:
Gennie: I think Esme has an upset stomach - she ate some newspaper yesterday.
Andrew: Yeah, some of those editorials can be a little hard to swallow.
Gennie looks around for something heavy to throw at Andrew.
I’ve been thinking about some ways of motivating myself to write more stuff here. I have lots of ideas and half-written bits and pieces, but I think the trouble is that I’m a perfectionist and hate “putting stuff out there” unless I’m completely happy with it. This is also why it takes me ages to reply to email sometimes.
I think I need to change the way I think about this blog (again). Currently it’s a sort of monster that I feel I need to keep on “feeding”. Meanwhile I also have a personal website that I also hardly ever update (except for the photos section). I think what I’d like to do is to take some of the pieces I have written here and put them on my website, and then start updating my website on a reasonably regular basis with new stuff. This new stuff will also appear here so that you don’t need to keep checking my website. That way my website will be something I can be more proud of (so I’ll be more likely to update it) and the things I write will accumulate into an impressive looking list.
An insight into my editing process
Tuesday, February 21st, 2006My blog posts don’t just spring fully-formed from my mind - I tend to edit and rewrite most of my posts somewhat before posting them. I often do this by putting my cursor at the first point in the post that needs changing, and then rewriting all the way to the end. After several iterations of this, I sometimes end up with a bunch of bits of abandoned post after the end of the finished post. For example, at the end of my post from two days ago I almost deleted the following pile of “scrap”:
“don’t think anyone would be capable of covering up such a massive the Bush administration that the fires could not have brought down the towers, but it is interesting to read all the unanswered questions about that day.”
But instead I decided to write this post about it.
Debauchery and snogging
Thursday, December 1st, 2005I’ve just been looking at my website usage statistics. Damn those wedding and honeymoon pictures generated a lot of traffic - almost 1600 hits for the wedding pictures and almost 800 for the honeymoon ones!
One of my largest referrers is Yahoo Image search and a very large fraction of those are from people searching for “debauchery” or “snogging”. Should I be worried about this trend?
I have a buffer
Monday, August 29th, 2005I want to avoid any more long periods of not writing in my blog from now on - in fact I hope to post every day. In order to achieve this I have taken a leaf from the book of Raymond Chen (possibly one of the most famous, influential and respected Microsoft bloggers). Raymond posts at 7am every weekday without fail and can do this so consistently (even when he is on holiday) because he has a backlog of posts which currently reaches into late December. So, while some friends were visiting for tea yesterday, I created a buffer of my own.
Now that I have a backlog, when I think of something to write I can jot down a few notes and gradually refine it into a fully-fledged post during the time it’s in the queue, instead of planning it and writing it - I longer have to make it into a fully polished post straight away. Maybe this kind of defies the point of blogging (which is supposed to be a raw, unpolished, up to the minute, stream of consciousness kind of thing) but it fits my perfectionist writing style better. I’m sure I’ll still make posts about my day-to-day life from time to time, but for the most part I’ll talk here about things which interest me and thoughts I’ve had.
In other news, things achieved today: hair is cut, car oil is replaced and media PC is (hopefully) fixed. I even went to work for a little bit.